Wait. What? That's not what I heard...
Jan. 27th, 2008 10:27 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
The No Stairway Anthology
To be upfront and honest, we're not quite ready for the reveal. Neither the comm nor the website are entirely ready, not all the process and procedures have been honed or tested, and our proposed staff have neither been allowed to review the project nor opted in on any level.
However, I seem to be doing a poor job of defining just what this project is and what it intends -- mostly because we've been using the procedure process to help refine our scope and better define our mission and goals -- but I did hear what people were saying and we did make note of their concerns. We can't guarantee this will satisfy everybody, but we do hope it at least gives people a place to start assessing what we plan on doing instead of what they think we are doing -- or even why.
People form opinions and take positions that are entirely valid to them -- and the information in the link below may change no one's mind, and it is as likely as not to generate more questions and possibly more concerns. Fair enough. But I'm sincerely hoping that at least some information -- as opposed to speculation -- might at least give the project a chance.
So, please go here: http://community.livejournal.com/nostairway/
at least this way, if you still think it's a bad idea, at least it will be the right bad idea.
*and for anyone keeping track, the "Anthology" part of the idea jumped in and wrestled us all to the ground around midnight Friday. *g*
no subject
Date: 2008-01-27 06:17 pm (UTC)if they call it 'good' fiction, people are insulted.
if they call it 'best' fiction, people are insulted.
if they call it 'literary' fiction, people are insulted.
any word that indicates a qualitative ideal, that's pretentious, it's elitism, it's snobbery, it's mean.
what WOULD make people happy? here's our zine, we just picked stuff at random 'cos we don't really care about what it's in it. sorry about all those typos and formatting errors and the fact that a sentinel story got in there by accident, but that's fair, right?
no subject
Date: 2008-01-27 06:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-27 06:32 pm (UTC)i should bow out of this conversation now, my only place in this project is aesthetic anyway. css doesn't get mad if you sometimes call it html. :\
no subject
Date: 2008-01-27 06:48 pm (UTC)I don't get this, unless you're equating 'writes just for fun' with 'doesn't care about quality in their work'. Perhaps I'm misunderstanding you, but I think it's entirely possible to care greatly about craft and still write just for fun. I do write professionally, and I'm pretty serious about my craft, but that doesn't negate the fact that when if I should happen to write wingfic, my worries about adverb elimination and magnificent, evocative turn of phrase are secondary to how hot Dean is with wings. That doesn't mean I don't care about the quality of the sentences describing his hotness, though.
Anyway. I think I should bow out now, too.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-27 10:46 pm (UTC)i've participated in dozens of conversations about the quality of fanfic, and if i say but what about characterization, plot, pacing, these foundations of good writing, frequently someone will reply, oh, i am just writing for fun, i don't care about any of that.
if you care about both, that is awesome. more power to you. and maybe you'd consider letting us read something of yours.
there are those who do not. that too is awesome, and more power to them, but they probably won't be picked up by this little net we've devised. it isn't because they're worth any less, they're just rubies instead of emeralds, and we like green. :)